“Be careful what you wish for”, they say, “as you
might just get it.” The quip is brutally
common in the social science called economics.
The cardinal rule of economics -- you cannot interfere with the law of
supply and demand.
In this case we direct the quip towards the Roosevelt
economists who flat out reject the notion of returning to the gold
standard. Gold is economic relic and too
restrictive as it does not guarantee that currency base will grow at the pace
of the economy. Gold bugs are equivalent
to those crazy people who cling to guns and religion.
Dare we reconsider?
The current deflationary cycle is suffocating our debt
fueled economy. In this election year,
political gridlock and policy paralysis slowly tightens a noose around the
nascent economic rebound of the last three quarters. Capital flight out of Europe and Russia and
into US Dollar denominated assets creates a needlessly stronger dollar combined
with artificially low interest rates.
Artificial, as those rates are below the current inflationary figures
and suppressed by the bond purchases of the Federal Reserve. The credit spread between corporate bonds and
US Treasuries is widening not because cash-flush corporations are a bad bet but
for the reason that capital flight is seeking an immediate safe haven.
The Fed in
its infinite wisdom purchased over $1 trillion in these bonds the weary huddled
masses Europeans so eagerly demand. Paul
Krugman the Nobel Prize NY Times columnist cries out that the Treasury
Department should take advantage of this situation and supply the market more
of these coveted bonds via Treasury auctions and use the proceeds to purchase
labor (i.e. shovel-ready projects) so recently and long term out of favor. He rightly suggests the Federal Reserve print
more money to counter the rapid appreciation of the US Dollar and supply the
public with the money to offset the deflationary debt trap.
And yet, both institutions cannot do the right
thing. Policy maker’s hands are
effectively handcuffed. First, the Fed, after
two rounds of quantitative easing, must not act as a stooge to the current
administration whose political fortunes are now directly tied to the health of
the economy. It must maintain the facade
of independence. Secondly, amid record
deficits and the specter of yet another deficit spending ceiling debate, our
Treasury Department husbands its political and financial resources until after
the election. Deficit reduction is the
mind-set of those pesky populists seeking the stern policy of austerity.
There you have it…gridlock and paralysis from two
powerful quasi-independent organizations.
High gold prices signal producers that consumers
demand more of the relic of monetary policy.
The old adage… ‘The solution to high prices…is high prices” comes into
play. Producers willingly respond. Old mining
operations are refurbished and new discoveries exploited. Billionaire executives from Silicon Valley invest
part of their wealth to capture the super-nova detritus in space containing
Atomic number 78 and 79. No political
discussion necessary.
The law of supply and demand naturally creates the
currency the nation so desperately seeks.
No government mandate or ceiling to interfere -- just raw greed to
replace legions of stymied policy makers.
Economist Milton Friedman in his Nobel prize treatise “A Monetary
History of the United States: 1867 to 1960” points out that all too often
Federal Reserve policy makers know the right policy moves during a time of
crisis but are handcuffed into making the wrong decision because of political
expediency-- not making a decision is the wrong decision in financial markets.
The Fed should print dollars to purchase
bullion from any willing seller of gold.
The new inventory of gold is an asset the balance sheet of the Fed, currency the offsetting liability.
As the economy recovers the Fed would chose between two assets it
could sell to drain cash from the system – bonds or gold. There is strength in the diversity of policy
choices.
Practically the policy is automatic. Ordinarily money supply growth should correspond to the target growth of the economy of say two percent of $13 trillion. If gold purchases comprised of 20 percent of monetary growth, the Fed could easily buy 1200 Gold Futures contracts (100oz) discretely throughout the day to create these monies. The Fed takes delivery of the gold and those monies are now permanent in the system. The physical gold exchanged with the Treasury and Gold certificates received in return as is the current practice. Simple. Think of this policy executed daily as a drip line to the private economy. A $2000 linux box is all that is required.
Practically the policy is automatic. Ordinarily money supply growth should correspond to the target growth of the economy of say two percent of $13 trillion. If gold purchases comprised of 20 percent of monetary growth, the Fed could easily buy 1200 Gold Futures contracts (100oz) discretely throughout the day to create these monies. The Fed takes delivery of the gold and those monies are now permanent in the system. The physical gold exchanged with the Treasury and Gold certificates received in return as is the current practice. Simple. Think of this policy executed daily as a drip line to the private economy. A $2000 linux box is all that is required.
To paraphrase Walter Bagehot, history’s first
central banker, ‘Lend freely but at an exacting price’. The Fed lends freely but its coveted bonds are
locked in a digital vault in New York. Selling
those bonds at a tidy profit to our desperate Europeans is a contraction of
money to central bank watchers and would send the market into a tailspin. A
simple solution is re-instating gold bullion as part of the repertoire of monetary
tools. Gold does not necessarily need to
a standard but it can certainly be a diversified outlet of money to the economy. Buying more bonds only distorts the current
pricing mechanism of interest rates and enriches the fortunes of entrenched
bankers. Money creation through gold
sales directly distributes money to the entrepreneurial class and is not
trapped in the arcane world of excess reserves.
Banks would no longer have a monopoly on the issuance of new monies and
might be force to compete for the cash available from the completive outlet of
gold purchases. The scarcity of gold
would ensure that such purchasing power is not abused.
The tragic irony in this tale: the liberating fiat
currency is now a conservative shackle and the ancient gold relic just might be
a liberating stimulant.
No comments:
Post a Comment